Clan league!

[Harti]

(11-30-2012 10:36 AM)Necrocat219 Wrote:  Eh, I'm going to have to say Tmutanavce;dr:
Too many unused terms and not a very clear explanation; didn't read

Okay I did read it and I get the gist of it but is there any way you can make your own explenation that can tell us it in a clear and concise way?

Yeah as I said it's the raaaaw concept and I didn't feel like braining a rock solid concept together last night which people may not like in the end of the day.
So I put up the corner stones: Hidden mindgame-like player assignments, 2v2 and 1v1 games. The rest is up for discussion. But it seems that people don't like to create tournament rules, so I'll have to go with the stuff on my mind. Will be updating this thread on Tuesday or so.

Quote:Also I don't understand why certain players would be worth more points than others.

This is to increase the importance of certain games, you will want to put your better players into that particular spot, but then again you could just assign your better players to the other matches, so you're getting X "safe" wins or something.

(11-30-2012 12:04 PM)CombatEX Wrote:  Personally I think Harti's system looks good. However, not sure it's necessary when teams can simply both PM the names of the players to the coordinator without the other team knowing.

This requires a person
- that is neutral and won't tell anybody
- that's active on the forums
- AND willing to do that over and over and over again.

Not happening I guess. Also you can't view the pairings directly, like when the last clan entered their submission, you will have to wait for the neutral person to collect the pairings. Furthermore, copypasting is sometimes error prone, so with a system like that we can get rid of all of these points.
Except, maybe, that I do have database access. But I certainly won't be peeking into the submissions as it would be far too cumbersome for me to do for the little gain.