The Outwitters Uber Cup!

[GreatGonzales]

(01-05-2013 08:15 AM)awpertunity Wrote:  Huh? You mean ARE NOT?

Also I feel like the 2v2 random tourney should not be included in this... It is such a different tournament and seems weird to compare results of this with standard 1v1 tourneys.

I think awpertunity raises a good point about mixing 1v1 tournaments and 2v2 tournaments. A) because the skillset is different, and B) because the dedicated players tend to be somewhat different. It may make sense to categorize tournaments as either 1v1 or 2v2, and give distinct scores for each. You could still also give a total score which is the sum of the two scores, but I think I agree that they should be separate. The one anomaly is the 2v2 random open, but I would still call that a 2v2 tournament.

---

(01-06-2013 06:19 AM)Gfich Wrote:  Now, when multiple people tie on a certain tourney, the average of the places they cover is taken, then rounded up (ex. In the 1st 1v1, places 5-8 tie, their average is 6.5, rounded up gives 7). I made an exception when there is a tie on bronze, and kept that a tie on bronze.

Ok, I was wondering about this. Makes sense.

Quote:1st 1v1 tourney: 20
1st 2v2 tourney: 14
World Cup: 45
College b-ball: 30
2v2r open: 24
OWSA: 22
Melodramatic Mini Mobi Tourney: 6

How did you come up with these values? I think it's important that we come up with a system that can be replicated going forward, so we stay consistent. Just glancing at this, the 1st 2v2 tournament seems high (only 8 participants), and OWSA seems low?