Poll: What do you think about this proposed change: Gaining wits for kills?
'Wits for kills' would worsen the game
'Wits for kills' would improve the game
[Show Results]
 
Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 2 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Alex & Adam - Getting +1 Wit for Kills: Why it's a really poor change to Outwitters
10-27-2012, 03:40 AM
Post: #83
RE: Alex & Adam - Getting +1 Wit for Kills: Why it's a really poor change to Outwitters
(10-27-2012 03:34 AM)Alvendor Wrote:  My gut reaction when I heard about this change was "why change anything that ain't broken?"

But the more I think about it, I have a hard time coming up with strong arguments against it. The increased complexity is a good thing in my opinion. Simple rules which results in complex behavior is what makes strategy games fun. The more moves you play on autopilot in a game the less I think you enjoy it.

Pros:
Increased complexity while still simple
Easier to break up a turtling player
Heavy becomes more valuable

Cons:
Slight FTA increase
Suicide tactics less viable

Neutral/Not sure:
Runner becomes less valuable - but will still be needed for vision
Mobi becomes stronger - hit and run tactics more viable
Changes bombshell - easier to kill but can earn more than 1 wit per attack
Mobi and bombshell changes might require a boost to the scrambler?

I agree with you alvendor and thanks for pointing out that the scrambler needs a boost, im sure it gives more credibility coming from someone as highly ranked as you are
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
RE: Alex & Adam - Getting +1 Wit for Kills: Why it's a really poor change to Outwitters - blckace - 10-27-2012 03:40 AM

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

Return to TopReturn to Content