Poll: Which maps (if any) should be retired? This poll is closed. |
|||
Sharkfood Island | 68 | 11.91% | |
Long Nine | 29 | 5.08% | |
Glitch | 22 | 3.85% | |
Foundry | 74 | 12.96% | |
Sweetie Plains | 35 | 6.13% | |
Peekaboo | 84 | 14.71% | |
Reaper | 36 | 6.30% | |
Thorn Gulley | 33 | 5.78% | |
Don't remove any maps! | 190 | 33.27% | |
Total | 571 vote(s) | 100% |
* You voted for this item. | [Show Results] |
Which Maps to Retire?
02-07-2013, 02:17 AM
Post: #86
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Which Maps to Retire?
(02-06-2013 04:01 AM)aaronINdayton Wrote: I don't want them to just keep adding maps, because then to stay competitive players would have to practice even more maps with even more match-ups Because high-level play should be based on exhaustive memorization rather than general strategic and tactical ability? The more variety the better I say. Though I think chess960 is better than standard chess for the same reason. Rote memorization of openings (race - map matchups in this case) is just boring. Ja Karta: Long Shadow division w/Niloc 1308 & Buzz Killingtun: Hidden Owl & Proud Turtle divisions Happy to accept friendlies! (Could use the practice. ; ) |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread:
3 Guest(s)
3 Guest(s)
Return to TopReturn to Content