Game balancing

[game_taker]

(01-10-2013 09:00 PM)burnodrod Wrote:  

(01-09-2013 10:09 AM)connor34911 Wrote:  I like how it is. I like that you pick a team and are challenged to do well on any given map.

It's up to you, you can always stick with your team and never change it. But why do you want to force others to do the same? You can't make all maps perfectly balanced for all races, I think that's impossible. Having that we have to choose one race that we feel is safest to play on all the maps in average. I would choose different races for different maps if I had that option. And that would be more interesting replays to see, I guess. Sometimes I'm just losing my interest for the game when I get the map which I don't like to play with this race. Am I the only one?

As you probably know, those who start a game can choose a map and, therefore, can choose a race, i.e. you can decide what race and map you want, than you start massively games with the chosen race and cancel all maps you don't like. So, additionaly to FTA first player has SFTA (Second FTA) as he can choose a map\race.

And now I ask my question again: why don't give us that option since it's not so hard to implement and it would tike less time rather than trying to get a perfect balance among all maps and races?

Someone already posted a thread talking about this. I will give your comment the same response I gave the thread, "No".