Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 3 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Merit to fast 2v2 arranged teams
12-13-2013, 01:03 PM
Post: #21
RE: Merit to fast 2v2 arranged teams
(12-13-2013 03:45 AM)Juslas Wrote:  2v2 blitz is pointless, since it is slow even if all players do moves immediately and do not chat or plan together.
But those two teams I mentioned are fascinatingly fast taking their turns. They do win, too.
Here is some Acrospire matches that were completed in a week, last three simultaneously:

outwitters://viewgame?id=ahRzfm91dHdpdHRlcnNnYW1lLWhyZHIVCxIIR2FtZVJvb20YgICAyKezlgsM
outwitters://viewgame?id=ahRzfm91dHdpdHRlcnNnYW1lLWhyZHIVCxIIR2FtZVJvb20YgICAmNP26woM
outwitters://viewgame?id=ahRzfm91dHdpdHRlcnNnYW1lLWhyZHIVCxIIR2FtZVJvb20YgICA2JXLxQoM
outwitters://viewgame?id=ahRzfm91dHdpdHRlcnNnYW1lLWhyZHIVCxIIR2FtZVJvb20YgICA2IuV9QoM

I like chat and play slow, some of my teammates are faster, some slower than me.
Pace was probably too fast to us, since those simultaneous blitz 2v2 all ended to our lost! But opponent had FTA on every single match, so 3-1 is not that bad, isn't it?
As the games were on Acrospire, I believe FTA isn't as big an advantage even though I've never really felt it on the other maps so much either but especially so on Acro. I would like to watch those games when I have more time.
(12-13-2013 05:27 AM)TheQwertiest Wrote:  anyway not a big fan of those who make hasty turns. usually does not end well (not a good game. 1 sided or lots of easily avoidable mistakes).
but if i had to make a vote it would be acameronp and his partner

(12-12-2013 11:23 AM)alexjiang1 Wrote:  I don't feel this should be an award. 2v2 requires in immense amount of coordination and strategy with your partner. Playing fast (under 5) means you're not accounting for everything available and not taking into account your partners ideas and how you can fulfill not only your own but also theirs.
Anyways, just my 2 cents, I know me and Banger moved every 2.5-3 days

i agree but the max for us on normal turns would be 2 days. sometimes reaching 3 for crucial turns

(12-13-2013 04:00 AM)Mag!cGuy Wrote:  Kudos to the ninjas for sending their turns very quickly too! It's awesome to be able to play many turns this quick ^^

though quick turns isnt neccesarily bad.. as long as it doesnt affect your skill.
i think the ninja bros would have been easily higher in rank if they decreased their games and took more time in making their turns.
I agree on these points, opponents who moved fast against us are a joy to play against. Games end in a day sometimes (played one 2v2 blitz with WorldFamous and DMFDie that was over in 1hours, 16turns) and we've never lost.
(12-13-2013 06:26 AM)Juslas Wrote:  Acameronp has astonishing speed with skill that slows down the opponent! Ninja brothers have dropped out of top 100 ranking, maybe because of their speed.
9. Trahogektor & gektotraher
16. paco bru & 4munt
on the other hand had climbed to top 10 and top 20.
Both teams having around 600 league points at the end of season 3 (source OSN).
I haven't seen them play or played against them (maybe once against traho) so I'm not justified to make the comment but I agree with Qwertiest, I think they could be higher and if they slowed down they could break into the top 5. Again, not my place to make that comment but I'll watch your games against paco.

iPro Clan
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
Merit to fast 2v2 arranged teams - Juslas - 11-29-2013, 09:41 PM
RE: Merit to fast 2v2 arranged teams - alexjiang1 - 12-13-2013 01:03 PM

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

Return to TopReturn to Content