Outwitters WORLD CUP Winner - Alvendor (SWEDEN)
09-02-2012, 10:51 AM
(This post was last modified: 09-02-2012 11:11 AM by awpertunity.)
Post: #58
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Outwitters WORLD CUP Signups (6 slots left)
(09-02-2012 04:29 AM)P1noyboypj Wrote: I'm curious. So is it better to forfeit and lose 6-5 than win with 1 point left on ur base (giving u only 2 points)? If all of your other bracket opponents do this against each other and you only manage to win barely win all games, you will be behind in points. No, because that would give you a D which is worth only 1 total point where as the W would get you 3 total points. You may have a smaller Point Differential but that is secondary to total points. (09-02-2012 04:29 AM)P1noyboypj Wrote: I think total rounds it takes to win is a better indicator than health left on a base on how a game went. Yes thinking it over I think you and the people saying this are right. The longer a game takes in general, the more hard-fought/closer of a match is must have been. I was just worried that this would lead to a gigantic turtle-fest, but the extra upside is that there will be even smaller chances of a complete tie. I will try to find a way to use this as opposed to base health... (09-02-2012 08:23 AM)Ravernoth Wrote:(08-30-2012 10:11 AM)awpertunity Wrote: OUTWITTERS WORLD CUP The problem I see with random maps in group play is the non-uniformity. This would actually make FTA a bigger problem (what if you get assigned the largest FTA map as P2 and the smallest FTA maps as P1?) The fair way to do it with be that the map is the same for each group, but I don't really like the idea of playing 6 games on the same map at the same time. (09-02-2012 02:40 AM)qkid21 Wrote: quenson21 290 points and 2435 wins? or 2435 points and 290 wins? Either way that seems crazy... ? Okay, I have changed the rules of Group Play to use # of turns taken to determine points as opposed to remaining base health. Please read the new rules. And of course, suggestions and criticisms will be very helpful and much appreciated! |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread:
4 Guest(s)
4 Guest(s)
Return to TopReturn to Content