Weekly Top 200 - 8/2/2013
|
08-04-2013, 04:33 PM
(This post was last modified: 08-04-2013 04:45 PM by Mag!cGuy.)
Post: #21
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Weekly Top 200 - 8/2/2013
Some ST's rather have a top master level, but won a lot of battle against other top master and a few ST, then got to St and aren't able to hold a positive ratio when they climb. So, they fall to 60th/70th, but not enough so that the game considers they should be master again. There is also a bunch of inactive ST, that's why I think there are more or less only 50 real ST's ^^ You're gonna be promoted soon, at top 40 you should be in.
Edit: forgot we were talking about top 200 and that inactive are kicked after a long time, so my statement is not so true But as for the leaderboards, there is by no mean 100 ST
You can ask a... ![]() (drawing by Chemoeum)
|
|||
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)
1 Guest(s)
Return to TopReturn to Content


But as for the leaderboards, there is by no mean 100 ST
![[Image: 6BmXQqC.jpg]](http://imgur.com/6BmXQqC.jpg)
![[Image: sig.png]](http://wappdesign.net/outwitters/sig.png)

