observations about V1.2 and suggestions for V1.4

[KahvUnited]

I do like the changed menus. I don't however like the combination of the 8 wits for player two at the same time as the wit for kills.

It now seems (to me anyway) that there is a big advantage to being player 2 - I think 6 or 7 would have been more appropriate. But I am not a pro at the game - although I certainly have trouble winning now being second in 1v1.

[=) Random Task (=]

(11-22-2012 04:07 AM)Eijolend Wrote:  

(11-21-2012 09:52 PM)Random Task Wrote:  I created this thread. Can I change the title? or can only a moderator do this?

Yes you can. Just launch a full-edit on your opening post and change the Subject.

thanks buddy. did that.

[=) Random Task (=]

forum bug bump

[oneadamleft]

(11-21-2012 08:50 PM)Emuchu Wrote:  

(11-21-2012 01:04 PM)poweewee Wrote:  I agree. I was in one of these games, where the opponent's BS was right there for the picking, but I couldn't attack it because I would leave too many units for the opponent to kill. He had three BS by the way, so killing one does not give me much.

---

Well... once your opponent is sitting on three Bombshells, you're kinda boned no matter which ruleset we're using.

lmao.

[AlanW1980]

can you please add a button to try and resend the game when it fails? I play on the train a lot (dropping in and out of signal reception) and if it fails to send I have to exit to the main menu, jump back into the game, skip the replay and try to send again.... very annoying.

Loving the +1 for a kill. makes you think about your moves a lot more.

Bramble seems very powerful to me, just had someone do a right number on me on a map. really drove me back to my base and made me think again. It was quite a sight to see it cover the whole map

[game_taker]

(11-22-2012 12:35 PM)KahvUnited Wrote:  I do like the changed menus. I don't however like the combination of the 8 wits for player two at the same time as the wit for kills.

It now seems (to me anyway) that there is a big advantage to being player 2 - I think 6 or 7 would have been more appropriate. But I am not a pro at the game - although I certainly have trouble winning now being second in 1v1.

Their is a thread with the title "8 is too much!!!" look at it, realize how wrong you are.

[=) Random Task (=]

As for "suggestions for v1.3" I would like to bring the option to play a "quick/speed game" idea with something between 5 to 7 minutes turn around time back up.

[game_taker]

Fix the pause button on the replay. For me it has an approx 20% success rate. (Not sure on exact percent its some low number like that).

[Da Wizerd]

(11-24-2012 01:01 PM)game_taker Wrote:  Fix the pause button on the replay. For me it has an approx 20% success rate. (Not sure on exact percent its some low number like that).

QFT

[Riptor]

We can change title now for V1.4

My idea :
When you select a Thorn (Veggienauts), show the parents because in a long game we can't remember the order of creation.