+- One Man Left Studios Community Forums (http://www.onemanleft.com/forums)
+-- Forum: General (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Outwitters (/forumdisplay.php?fid=11)
+--- Thread: Win/Loss ratio required for promotion (/showthread.php?tid=2198)
RE: Win/Loss ratio required for promotion - Mag!cGuy - 06-24-2013 07:42 PM
Two more wins, it's getting more and more slow
outwitters://viewgame?id=ag5vdXR3aXR0ZXJzZ2FtZXIRCxIIR2FtZVJvb20Yn4HnAw
outwitters://viewgame?id=ag5vdXR3aXR0ZXJzZ2FtZXIRCxIIR2FtZVJvb20YzPbiAww
--> toughest game I've had so far!
RE: Win/Loss ratio required for promotion - baopu - 06-25-2013 01:11 AM
Are people still being promoted? I've been languishing in gifted all "season" but I've been winning easily at a 5:1 clip.
RE: Win/Loss ratio required for promotion - Mag!cGuy - 06-25-2013 01:17 AM
Do you meet master? If it's not the case, that means you were a very low gifted at the beginning
RE: Win/Loss ratio required for promotion - baopu - 06-25-2013 01:39 AM
I finished last season 10th in gifted too :,(
RE: Win/Loss ratio required for promotion - Mag!cGuy - 06-25-2013 01:49 AM
Points and raking don't matter, they mean nothing
only hidden rating skill does, and you can only know it by noticing you meet higher tier player. Does that happen?
RE: Win/Loss ratio required for promotion - baopu - 06-25-2013 02:15 AM
Hmm... Where did my reply go?
RE: Win/Loss ratio required for promotion - Juslas - 06-25-2013 03:07 AM
A week is too short to finish 2v2 match, but I did rise on ranking without finishing my 6th random 2v2 game. I'll repost when I get ST status ;-)
RE: Win/Loss ratio required for promotion - baopu - 06-25-2013 03:31 AM
Anyway, without pontificating on the "secret ranking" can anyone tell me if they've been promoted in the last couple of days/weeks.
RE: Win/Loss ratio required for promotion - [PETA] Doodat - 06-25-2013 04:13 AM
I was promoted in season 3 relatively quickly.
RE: Win/Loss ratio required for promotion - baopu - 06-25-2013 06:57 AM
I love the Internet: full of answers, few of them pertinent.