+- One Man Left Studios Community Forums (http://www.onemanleft.com/forums)
+-- Forum: General (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Tournaments (/forumdisplay.php?fid=14)
+--- Thread: The Super Crazy Awkward Feedback Tournament [Round 6] (/showthread.php?tid=1683)
RE: The Super Crazy Awkward Feedback Tournament [Round 2] - harvarnold - 02-18-2013 10:12 PM
(02-18-2013 04:05 PM)SerPurpleWolf Wrote: IF Gfich is able to play, the two LOWEST turn count game losers will be eliminated.
Wouldn't that cause major turtling, since nobody wants to have the lowest number of turns?
RE: The Super Crazy Awkward Feedback Tournament [Round 2] - Wildt4lon - 02-19-2013 12:37 AM
(02-18-2013 04:05 PM)SerPurpleWolf Wrote: With results from round one, two people needed to be eliminated and two people conviently DQed. Weirdly enough both by spawning snipers.Um.
Oops.
RE: The Super Crazy Awkward Feedback Tournament [Round 2] - Ser Purple Wolf - 02-19-2013 01:38 AM
(02-18-2013 10:12 PM)harvarnold Wrote:(02-18-2013 04:05 PM)SerPurpleWolf Wrote: IF Gfich is able to play, the two LOWEST turn count game losers will be eliminated.
Wouldn't that cause major turtling, since nobody wants to have the lowest number of turns?
Unfortunately that can be a side effect. I hope everyone realizes this is for fun, and doing as such would be a major annoyance.
RE: The Super Crazy Awkward Feedback Tournament [Round 2] - harvarnold - 02-19-2013 07:47 AM
Why not do high and low eliminated? That would discourage turtling, and would give players incentive to play normally.
RE: The Super Crazy Awkward Feedback Tournament [Round 2] - Ser Purple Wolf - 02-19-2013 09:43 PM
Maybe the last two sets of people who turn in their replays.
RE: The Super Crazy Awkward Feedback Tournament [Round 2] - Alvendor - 02-19-2013 09:47 PM
(02-19-2013 01:38 AM)SerPurpleWolf Wrote:(02-18-2013 10:12 PM)harvarnold Wrote:(02-18-2013 04:05 PM)SerPurpleWolf Wrote: IF Gfich is able to play, the two LOWEST turn count game losers will be eliminated.
Wouldn't that cause major turtling, since nobody wants to have the lowest number of turns?
Unfortunately that can be a side effect. I hope everyone realizes this is for fun, and doing as such would be a major annoyance.
Scout's honor?
RE: The Super Crazy Awkward Feedback Tournament [Round 2] - harvarnold - 02-19-2013 10:50 PM
(02-19-2013 09:43 PM)SerPurpleWolf Wrote: Maybe the last two sets of people who turn in their replays.
What?
RE: The Super Crazy Awkward Feedback Tournament [Round 2] - Ser Purple Wolf - 02-20-2013 06:39 AM
(02-19-2013 10:50 PM)harvarnold Wrote:(02-19-2013 09:43 PM)SerPurpleWolf Wrote: Maybe the last two sets of people who turn in their replays.
What?
The last two matches that are reported? I kind-a worded that funny.
I'm probably going to do the high/low thing. I really just threw the both lowest thing in because it was about 1 in the morning and I didn't think Gfich would be playing the second round. On top of that, I have been looking at a way to remove myself without giving someone a free win. If anyone was wondering, I didn't look at Round 1 results until my match was over.
RE: The Super Crazy Awkward Feedback Tournament [Round 2] - harvarnold - 02-20-2013 10:27 PM
(02-20-2013 06:39 AM)SerPurpleWolf Wrote:(02-19-2013 10:50 PM)harvarnold Wrote:(02-19-2013 09:43 PM)SerPurpleWolf Wrote: Maybe the last two sets of people who turn in their replays.
What?
The last two matches that are reported? I kind-a worded that funny.
Why on earth would you do last 2 matches reported? I would just give up right away and report my loss, but not be eliminated. High-low makes much more sense.
RE: The Super Crazy Awkward Feedback Tournament [Round 2] - laYahooz - 02-21-2013 09:34 AM
Round 2? So are you PMing the matchups?